Rays SDRResearch application · simulation study

Microwave imaging research on the 8T8R platform

Eight coherent receive channels, a stepped-frequency sweep and an antenna switch matrix are the ingredients of a multistatic microwave imaging system. Before building a bench, we model the whole chain in full-wave simulation: antennas, coupling medium, tissue-like phantoms and the image reconstruction.

Status Research demonstration with simulation data only. No measurement on the 8T8R board has been made for this work; no image on this page is a measurement. Not for use on people; not intended for diagnosis, monitoring or treatment.

0.5–2 GHz stepped-frequency sweep (simulation)32 or 64 antennas: 8T8R + switches2-D and 3-D FDTDDemonstration ≈ 11 MB, desktop browser
head phantom · 64-antenna helmet · 3-D result
Three-dimensional head phantom with a translucent scalp and brain, a red high-permittivity inclusion inside, the gold 3-D microwave image of the change next to it, and the 64 antennas of the helmet array around the head
3-D full-wave simulation, not a measurement. Red: high-permittivity inclusion (phantom, schematic). Gold: reconstructed change, −3 dB. Head phantom derived from the BrainWeb digital brain model.

What is simulated

The same steps a bench would follow, each one modelled.

ARRAY

Antennas around the phantom

A head-worn conformal array or a ring around a breast phantom, behind a coupling pad. Eight transmit and eight receive channels are multiplexed to 32 or 64 antennas with RF switches.

SWEEP

Stepped-frequency, every pair

Each transmitter steps through the band while all receivers record; the result is a complex transfer function for every transmit–receive pair and frequency.

FULL WAVE

FDTD with tissue properties

Finite-difference time-domain models in 2-D and 3-D, with frequency-dependent tissue permittivity and conductivity and the antenna structures included.

IMAGE

Differential reconstruction

Two scans of the same phantom are compared and a back-projection image of the change is formed. The demonstration shows the scans, the difference and the raw data.

Interactive demonstration

Run a simulated scan in the browser

Opens in a new window. Best on a desktop browser; the 3-D view needs a connection to load its graphics library.

Head phantom

Localising a dielectric change

An axial slice and a 3-D head phantom derived from the BrainWeb digital brain model. A high-permittivity inclusion grows between two scans; the differential image shows where the change is. Simulation based on the BrainWeb digital brain phantom (see Data sources).

Breast phantoms

Single scans and size change

Phantoms of low and scattered fibroglandular density with a 10 mm high-permittivity inclusion, and a differential case in which the inclusion shrinks from 10 to 6 mm.

head phantom · axial slice · differential image
Left: permittivity map of an axial head-phantom slice with a grown high-permittivity inclusion and the ring of antennas around it. Right: the differential microwave image between two scans, brightest at the inclusion
2-D full-wave simulation, not a measurement. Dashed: inclusion after growth.

Open the interactive demonstration →

What the simulations show so far

Stated with their limits. Analyses were written down before they were run, and are reported whether or not they met their criteria.

Works in simulation

Changes can be localised

In 2-D full-wave head-phantom simulations with modelled electronic errors, a growing high-permittivity inclusion is usually separable from no change and localised near the changed region. This holds under the simulation's own error model.

The limiting factor

Mechanical repeatability

When the antenna array is moved by 1 mm in the full-wave model, the false change it creates is as strong as the real change we look for. Electronics matter less than keeping the antennas still relative to the head between scans.

Open questions

Not yet established

A simple phase model of array motion did not hold in full-wave checks, and the 1 mm simulation grid has not converged against a 0.5 mm grid. Results under realistic motion are therefore not yet quantitative.

Data sources

Phantoms and references

The head phantoms are derived from the BrainWeb simulated brain database (McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute): brainweb.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/brainweb. Only our own simulation results are shown; the BrainWeb data files are not redistributed. The breast phantoms are generated procedurally by us.

  • C.A. Cocosco, V. Kollokian, R.K.-S. Kwan, A.C. Evans, “BrainWeb: Online Interface to a 3D MRI Simulated Brain Database”, NeuroImage 5(4), part 2/4, S425, 1997.
  • R.K.-S. Kwan, A.C. Evans, G.B. Pike, “MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(11):1085–1097, 1999.
  • R.K.-S. Kwan, A.C. Evans, G.B. Pike, “An Extensible MRI Simulator for Post-Processing Evaluation”, Visualization in Biomedical Computing (VBC’96), LNCS 1131, Springer, 1996, pp. 135–140.
  • D.L. Collins, A.P. Zijdenbos, V. Kollokian, J.G. Sled, N.J. Kabani, C.J. Holmes, A.C. Evans, “Design and Construction of a Realistic Digital Brain Phantom”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 17(3):463–468, 1998.

Research demonstration · simulation data only · not measured · not for use on people · not intended for diagnosis, monitoring or treatment.